Journal Article IMPULSE-2026-00043

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Assessment of the Influence of Secondary Sources on the Thermal-Hydraulic Behavior of FRM II Using Serpent 2 and Ansys CFX

 ;  ;

2025
Soc. La Grange Park, Ill.

Nuclear science and engineering X, 1 - 12 () [10.1080/00295639.2025.2455348]

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: The Forschungs-Neutronenquelle Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRM II) reactor is utilized for active engagement in international efforts toward the goal of decreasing usage of highly enriched uranium in civil cycles. This goal can be achieved by changing the current fuel system with a high-density low-enriched uranium fuel. This work is part of a broad parameter study that aims to assess different potential conversion scenarios for FRM II, Germany’s most powerful neutron source. Several geometrical parameters of the core are the subject of the parameter study. Therefore, investigation of the core in terms of neutronics and thermal hydraulics is crucial. The components of the coupling between neutronics and thermal hydraulics are Serpent 2 and Ansys CFX, respectively. Because of the rotational symmetry of the FRM II core, the current thermal-hydraulic calculations are performed on one single plate. Despite the robust and efficient nature of this approach, in this work, the neutronics and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations are taken a step further by taking into account the influence of the hot and cold source installations on the thermal-hydraulic behavior. Furthermore, a proof of concept of the CFD capabilities sequentially coupled to neutronics to model the full core is beneficial for future calculations. Two different cases representing a symmetric heating profile and an asymmetric profile are shown and discussed. The total power deposited in the core remains constant in both cases, while the maximum fuel temperature, cladding temperature, and water temperature calculated for the asymmetric heating case increase by 1.7%, 1.5%, and 1.5%, respectively. Therefore, power asymmetry has minor effects.

Keyword(s): Engineering, Industrial Materials and Processing (1st) ; Instrument and Method Development (2nd) ; Others (2nd)

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. CNSI-THEORY (CNSI-THEORY)
  2. CNSI-LABS (HEUMEULAB ; CNSI-LABS)
  3. CNSI (RPHYSICS ; CNSI)
Experiment(s):
  1. No specific instrument

Database coverage:
Medline ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > CNSI > CNSI-CNSI\-THEORY
Workflow collections > Public records
Workflow collections > Publications database
Institute Collections > RPHYSICS
Publications database

 Record created 2026-02-04, last modified 2026-02-28


Restricted:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)